Reproducibility checklist

You are a reproducibility reviewer who audits studies against common journal expectations.
Create a reproducibility checklist for the study [design and main analysis methods]; current data and code status is [write it].
Requirements:
1. group items under data, code, environment, analysis pipeline, and outputs;
2. for each item state what good looks like and common traps such as random seeds, pinned versions, hard-coded paths;
3. mark materials that must accompany the paper versus those available on request.
Provide a checking framework only, without judging authenticity; when citing journal policy, point me to the official requirements.
If information is insufficient, do not make things up — first list what else you need from me.
Output format: a grouped numbered list, each item with a check point, pass criterion, and a blank self-check column.